Comments on: Interesting poll results from the fall http://www.logipundit.com/2007/02/interesting-poll-results-from-the-fall.html A Bastion of Reason Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:26:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Logipundit http://www.logipundit.com/2007/02/interesting-poll-results-from-the-fall.html/comment-page-1#comment-2459 Logipundit Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:53:00 +0000 http://www.logipundit.com/blog/?p=1802#comment-2459 That's just a great answer...<br/><br/>polls are completely irrelevant.<br/><br/>Neither are Hannity and O'Reilly.<br/><br/>The conclusions to all of this theory would strike me as more relevant than either polls or pundit, but that's OK.<br/><br/>Just watched Loose Change (not sure which version--there are apparently a few). That’s just a great answer…

polls are completely irrelevant.

Neither are Hannity and O’Reilly.

The conclusions to all of this theory would strike me as more relevant than either polls or pundit, but that’s OK.

Just watched Loose Change (not sure which version–there are apparently a few).

]]> By: scottie http://www.logipundit.com/2007/02/interesting-poll-results-from-the-fall.html/comment-page-1#comment-2458 scottie Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:57:00 +0000 http://www.logipundit.com/blog/?p=1802#comment-2458 2nd line should read "<br/><br/>What part of the data is factual and easily verified do you not understand? 2nd line should read “

What part of the data is factual and easily verified do you not understand?

]]> By: scottie http://www.logipundit.com/2007/02/interesting-poll-results-from-the-fall.html/comment-page-1#comment-2457 scottie Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:56:00 +0000 http://www.logipundit.com/blog/?p=1802#comment-2457 I love people who dismiss arguments without digging into them.<br/><br/>What part of the data in my post is factual and easily verified.<br/><br/>First step is agree on verifiable facts.<br/><br/>Then you make conclusions.<br/><br/>If you want to dismiss arguments by making labels, that's fine. You have done it before, and I suspect that you will do it again.<br/><br/>But again, 50% of Americans dismiss the official version, so I guess half of all Americans are "conspiracy theorists", by your rationale.<br/><br/>By the way, most crimes are conspiracies.<br/><br/>You want the conclusions before you learn more. I'm sorry bubba, that ain't the way it works.<br/><br/>If you care to get to conclusions, then learn more about the inconsistencies.<br/><br/>Hannity would label and dismiss.<br/>O'Reilly would do the same.<br/><br/>Be bigger and better than those guys. I love people who dismiss arguments without digging into them.

What part of the data in my post is factual and easily verified.

First step is agree on verifiable facts.

Then you make conclusions.

If you want to dismiss arguments by making labels, that’s fine. You have done it before, and I suspect that you will do it again.

But again, 50% of Americans dismiss the official version, so I guess half of all Americans are “conspiracy theorists”, by your rationale.

By the way, most crimes are conspiracies.

You want the conclusions before you learn more. I’m sorry bubba, that ain’t the way it works.

If you care to get to conclusions, then learn more about the inconsistencies.

Hannity would label and dismiss.
O’Reilly would do the same.

Be bigger and better than those guys.

]]> By: Logipundit http://www.logipundit.com/2007/02/interesting-poll-results-from-the-fall.html/comment-page-1#comment-2456 Logipundit Mon, 12 Feb 2007 02:20:00 +0000 http://www.logipundit.com/blog/?p=1802#comment-2456 So let's see:<br/><br/>1) Lack of air defense<br/>2) nature of fall of towers<br/>3) periodic explosions within the buildings<br/>4) WTC#7 collapse<br/>5) Passport found on a street<br/>6) Molten Steel and cordite<br/>7) Put options on Airlines<br/>8) Missiles into the Pentagon?<br/>9) Dancing Israelis<br/>10) Willie Brown's warning<br/><br/>OK...you just went from credible Israel/Palestine guy to full-blown conspiracy theorist. But that's why we love having variety on the site.<br/><br/>So tell me, let's assume (and I don't) all of the above is dead on (to save me the googling). What does all of it prove? So let’s see:

1) Lack of air defense
2) nature of fall of towers
3) periodic explosions within the buildings
4) WTC#7 collapse
5) Passport found on a street
6) Molten Steel and cordite
7) Put options on Airlines
8) Missiles into the Pentagon?
9) Dancing Israelis
10) Willie Brown’s warning

OK…you just went from credible Israel/Palestine guy to full-blown conspiracy theorist. But that’s why we love having variety on the site.

So tell me, let’s assume (and I don’t) all of the above is dead on (to save me the googling). What does all of it prove?

]]>