<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike&#8217;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logipundit.com/2007/02/mikes-blog.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logipundit.com/2007/02/mikes-blog.html</link>
	<description>A Bastion of Reason</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Logipundit</title>
		<link>http://www.logipundit.com/2007/02/mikes-blog.html#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator>Logipundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logipundit.com/blog/?p=1883#comment-2658</guid>
		<description>great post...and great blog.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Starting a list of "U.S. Military Overseas" Blogs...you guys look out for some more.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Don't think it affects the argument that much, though.  "The biggest demoralizer" being the Army's extending orders (no argument there) doesn't mean a resolution from Congress saying they disagree with the mission doesn't have ANY effect.  But I certainly see his point.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And "the enemy is emboldened by all kinds of things..." does not mean they are NOT emboldened by dissent in our Congress about the war.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I would guess (and Mike knows better than I) that the war on the ground on a daily basis is probably never effected by our Congress' inane ramblings, because the Military is indeed very professional and the enemy is of course not fans of our Congress anyway.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, I really find it hard to believe the orchestrators and suppliers and leaders behind these insurgents (or whatever they're called now) don't watch CNN everyday, and see waning support for the war going as far as a Congressional resolution as a good sign for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post&#8230;and great blog.</p>
<p>Starting a list of &#8220;U.S. Military Overseas&#8221; Blogs&#8230;you guys look out for some more.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think it affects the argument that much, though.  &#8220;The biggest demoralizer&#8221; being the Army&#8217;s extending orders (no argument there) doesn&#8217;t mean a resolution from Congress saying they disagree with the mission doesn&#8217;t have ANY effect.  But I certainly see his point.</p>
<p>And &#8220;the enemy is emboldened by all kinds of things&#8230;&#8221; does not mean they are NOT emboldened by dissent in our Congress about the war.</p>
<p>I would guess (and Mike knows better than I) that the war on the ground on a daily basis is probably never effected by our Congress&#8217; inane ramblings, because the Military is indeed very professional and the enemy is of course not fans of our Congress anyway.</p>
<p>However, I really find it hard to believe the orchestrators and suppliers and leaders behind these insurgents (or whatever they&#8217;re called now) don&#8217;t watch CNN everyday, and see waning support for the war going as far as a Congressional resolution as a good sign for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
