<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One question:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logipundit.com/2008/02/one-question.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logipundit.com/2008/02/one-question.html</link>
	<description>A Bastion of Reason</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wdporter</title>
		<link>http://www.logipundit.com/2008/02/one-question.html#comment-4654</link>
		<dc:creator>wdporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logipundit.com/2008/02/one-question.html#comment-4654</guid>
		<description>That's true...states do make the decision.  But at what point do you think that Southern Conservatives have really had control of the party?

Bush 41 certainly wasn't...Bush 43 is only Southern because of his accent but every bit a part of that same "establishment" country club Republicanism.

But you're right, the country club Republicans do want EVEN MORE influence in the party...I'm just of the opinion that Southern Conservatives are being taken advantage of (or taken for granted) much to the same degree that African Americans are taken for granted by the Democratic party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true&#8230;states do make the decision.  But at what point do you think that Southern Conservatives have really had control of the party?</p>
<p>Bush 41 certainly wasn&#8217;t&#8230;Bush 43 is only Southern because of his accent but every bit a part of that same &#8220;establishment&#8221; country club Republicanism.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right, the country club Republicans do want EVEN MORE influence in the party&#8230;I&#8217;m just of the opinion that Southern Conservatives are being taken advantage of (or taken for granted) much to the same degree that African Americans are taken for granted by the Democratic party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhuber</title>
		<link>http://www.logipundit.com/2008/02/one-question.html#comment-4641</link>
		<dc:creator>jhuber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logipundit.com/2008/02/one-question.html#comment-4641</guid>
		<description>You know the states are the ones who make the decision, not the party as a whole. Assuming there was any diabolical plot in going on behind the scenes, it was probably the country club Republicans who wanted to get more influence in the party. Certainly not the Southern conservatives saying "we've had a good run. Let's let someone else have a shot at the party now."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know the states are the ones who make the decision, not the party as a whole. Assuming there was any diabolical plot in going on behind the scenes, it was probably the country club Republicans who wanted to get more influence in the party. Certainly not the Southern conservatives saying &#8220;we&#8217;ve had a good run. Let&#8217;s let someone else have a shot at the party now.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
